I'm running a full system protection backup. We've been using the data container destination because this allows us to a) restrict the overall size of the backup and b) locate it where we want to.
Choosing a local hard drive as the destination but not enabling data container means that I can do neither - I can choose a destination drive only, and the backups go right into the root of it. This isn't good enough!
I don't want to use the data container format anymore as in the last 3 weeks I've twice had to delete and recreate the VHD file because of problems, therefore losing all backups. Most recently we had a full system crash during the backup process resulting in a corrupted VHD file. A couple of weeks ago it just decided to no longer be able to mount the VHD. It's too prone to failure having all the backups in a single file like that. But without the data container the only destination I can choose is D:, E:, F: etc? And for size I can only choose to "use all available space" or "manually manage size" (which sounds like it will just use all available space)?
Our backup needs to go to a local folder so it can then be archived off to tape as well, and I don't want it to use all available space of our 9TB production storage, which is where it needs to go. I can stick a quota on a folder, but I can't even make it save the backup to that folder, and even if I could I don't then know if it will be aware of the quota or will just presume there is free space until it fills it and crashes with an error (I suspect the latter).
The only way I can get the backup into a folder is with a data container, which has broken twice in the last 3 weeks. Or I can just send it to the root of a drive. Neither option is good enough on a piece of software which has cost us £500 for the licenses we need - any other software, even free backup software, lets me choose a destination for the backup!